ABSTRACT
The >30 mutated residues in the Omicron spike protein have led to its rapid classification as a new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern. As a result, Omicron may escape from the immune system, decreasing the protection provided by COVID-19 vaccines. Preliminary data shows a weaker neutralizing antibody response to Omicron compared to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus, which can be increased after a booster vaccine. Here, we report that CD8+ T cells can recognize Omicron variant epitopes presented by HLA-A*02:01 in both COVID-19 recovered and vaccinated individuals, even 6 months after infection or vaccination. Additionally, the T cell response was stronger for Omicron variant epitopes after the vaccine booster. Altogether, T cells can recognize Omicron variants, especially in vaccinated individuals after the vaccine booster.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Current tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG, IgM, IgA) cannot differentiate recent and past infections. We describe a point of care, lateral flow assay for SARS-CoV-2 dIgA based on the highly selective binding of dIgA to a chimeric form of secretory component (CSC), that distinguishes dIgA from monomeric IgA. Detection of specific dIgA uses a complex of biotinylated SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain and streptavidin-colloidal gold. SARS-CoV-2-specific dIgA was measured both in 112 cross-sectional samples and a longitudinal panel of 362 plasma samples from 45 patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 193 discrete pre-COVID-19 or PCR-negative patient samples. The assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity from 11 days post-symptom onset, and a specificity of 98.2%. With an estimated half-life of 6.3 days, dIgA provides a unique biomarker for the detection of recent SARS-CoV-2 infections with potential to enhance diagnosis and management of COVID-19 at point-of-care.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: Public health emergencies – such as the 2020 COVID19 pandemic –accelerate the need for both evidence generation and rapid dissemination and implementation (D&I) of evidence where it is most needed. In this paper, we reflect on how D&I frameworks and methods can be pragmatic (i.e., relevant to real-world context) tools for rapid and iterative planning, implementation, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence to address public health emergencies. The Pragmatic, Rapid, and Iterative D&I (PRIDI) Cycle The PRIDI Cycle is based on a “double-loop” learning process, reflecting the iterative and adaptive D&I, along with iterative re-consideration of goals and priorities, interventions and corresponding D&I strategies, and needs and capacities of individuals and contexts. Stakeholder engagement is essential- which itself is an evolving activity. The results of iterative evaluations should be communicated with local implementers and stakeholders through customized feedbacks. Conclusion Even when the health system priority is provision of the best care to the individuals in need, and scientists are focused on development of effective diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, planning for D&I is critical. Without a flexible and adapting process of D&I, which is responsive to emerging evidence generation cycles, and is closely connected to stakeholders and target users through engagement and feedback, the interventions to mitigate public health emergencies – such as the COVID19 pandemic - will have limited reach and impact on populations that would most benefit. The PRIDI cycle is intended to provide a pragmatic approach to support planning for D&I throughout the evidence generation process.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
BackgroundLasting immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following infection is questioned because serum antibodies decline in convalescence. However, functional immunity is mediated by long-lived memory T and B (Bmem) cells. ObjectiveTo determine the longevity and immunophenotype of SARS-CoV-2-specific Bmem cells in COVID-19 patients. MethodsRecombinant spike receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid protein (NCP) were produced for ELISA-based serology, and biotinylated for fluorescent tetramer generation to identify SARS-CoV-2-specific Bmem cells by flow cytometry with a panel of 13 mAbs. 36 blood samples were obtained from 25 COVID-19 patients (11 paired) between 4-242 days post-symptom onset for detection of neutralizing antibodies, IgG serology and flow cytometry. ResultsThe recombinant RBD and NCP were specifically recognized by serum IgG in all patients and reactivity declined >20 days post-symptom onset. All patients had detectable RBD- and NCP-specific Bmem cells at 8.23-267.6 cells/ml of blood (0.004-0.13% of B cells) regardless of sampling time. RBD- and NCP-specific Bmem cells predominantly expressed IgM or IgG1, with the latter formed slightly later than the former. RBD-specific IgG+ Bmem were predominantly CD27+, and numbers significantly correlated with circulating follicular helper T cell numbers. ConclusionRBD- and NCP-specific Bmem cells persisted for 8 months, indicating that the decline in serum antibodies after 1 month does not indicate waning of immunity but a contraction of the immune response. Flowcytometric detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific Bmem cells enables detection of long-term functional immunity following infection or vaccination for COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Cardiac injury and dysfunction occur in COVID-19 patients and increase the risk of mortality. Causes are ill defined, but could be direct cardiac infection and/or ‘cytokine-storm’ induced dysfunction. To identify mechanisms and discover cardio-protective drugs, we use a state-of-the-art pipeline combining human cardiac organoids with high throughput phosphoproteomics and single nuclei RNA sequencing. We identify that ‘cytokine-storm’ induced diastolic dysfunction can be caused by a cocktail of interferon gamma, interleukin 1β and poly(I:C) and also human COVID-19 serum. Bromodomain protein 4 (BRD4) is activated along with pathology driving fibrotic and induced nitric oxide synthase genes. BRD inhibitors fully recover function in hCO and totally prevent death in a cytokine-storm mouse model. BRD inhibition decreases transcription of multiple genes, including fibrotic, induced nitric oxide synthase and ACE2, and prevention of cardiac infection with SARS-CoV2. Thus, BRD inhibitors are promising candidates to prevent COVID-19 mediated cardiac damage.Funding: We acknowledge grant and fellowship support from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (J.E.H., M.J.S., C.R.E., T.B.), Heart Foundation of Australia (J.E.H.), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (J.E.H.), The Stafford Fox Foundation (E.R.P.), the Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation (E.R.P.), Australian Research Council Strategic Initiative in Stem Cell Science (Stem Cells Australia) (E.R.P. and J.E.H.) and the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF9200008) (J.E.H., T.B., M.J.S., K.P.A.MD., C.R.E., E.R.P.). M.J.S. is supported by Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Program (APP1132519) and Investigator (APP1173958) grants. A.S. is also supported by Investigator grant (APP1173880). The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute is supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program. This project received support from Dynomics Inc. J.E.H. is supported by a Snow Medical Fellowship. Conflict of Interest: R.J.M., J.E.H., G.A.Q.-R., D.M.T. and E.R.P. are listed as co-inventors on pending patents held by The University of Queensland and QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute that relate to cardiac organoid maturation and putative cardiac regeneration therapeutics. J.E.H. is a coinventor on licensed patents held by the University of Goettingen. R.J.M, E.R.P., D.M.T., B.G. and J.E.H. are co-founders, scientific advisors and stockholders in Dynomics Inc. D.M.T. and B.G. are employees of Dynomics Inc. /Dynomics Pty Ltd. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute has filed a patent on the use of BRD inhibitors. Ethical Approval: Animal work was approved by the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Animal Ethics Committee. Ethical approval for the use of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) was obtained from QIMR Berghofer’s Ethics Committee and was carried out in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) regulations. Procedures complied with standards set under Australian guidelines for animal welfare and experiments were subject to Monash University animal welfare ethics review (Approval #MARP/2019/13606).